Contact Us for More Information

Beneficiary Designations for Benefit Plan Administrators

Posted by Corey F. Schechter | Apr 20, 2017 | 0 Comments

Shutterstock 545432005

Most qualified retirement plans, including ESOPs, 401(k)s, and 403(b)s provide for a designated beneficiary to receive benefits under the plan when the participant dies. When an employee designates a beneficiary, he or she may be filling out the documents along with dozens of other pages of documents related to a new job. However, confusion over who to name as a beneficiary and how to change beneficiary designation can lead to disputes later on.

As a default, most married individuals will put their spouse as their designated beneficiary, and unmarried individuals may name their parents or a sibling. However, plan participants rarely go through the process of updating or changing their beneficiaries, even after significant life changes. Once an employee leaves a job, they may still have benefits under a plan but are unsure of how to go about changing their beneficiary designations.

There have been a number of disputes involving who is entitled to ERISA plan benefits after the death of the participant. According to the Department of Labor, these disputes include questions “about whether the beneficiary designation accurately reflects the participant's intent.” Issues range from failing to change a designation of a spouse after divorce, incomplete designation forms, and designations inconsistent with the terms of a benefit plan.

Disputes can result in costly litigation for plan administrators. In a recent case in Florida, a former employee with a supermarket chain wanted to change the designated beneficiaries in her qualified retirement plan. Iraleth Rizo worked for the Publix company, participating in both the company's ESOP and 401(k). When initially filling out the designated beneficiaries, Rizo named her niece and nephew.

Ms. Rizo eventually left the company. When she was later diagnosed with cancer, she called and asked about making changes to her beneficiary designation. The representative told Ms. Rizo that she would send a letter naming her new beneficiaries and their Social Security numbers. Ms. Rizo sent the required information, naming a friend, Arlene Ruiz, as the new beneficiary. Unfortunately, Ms. Rizo died before the company received the update.

The niece and nephew received the benefits and Ms. Ruiz sued the plan administrator. The court found in favor of the plan administrator because although Ms. Rizo intended to change her beneficiaries, she “did not strictly comply with the Summary Plan Descriptions' directives for how to change her beneficiaries.”

Plan administrators can benefit from providing clear directives and instructions on naming beneficiaries and ensuring a designated beneficiary is properly named for plan participants. Language in plan documents, employee communications, and Summary Plan Descriptions should be clear and consistent.

Plan administrators may also want to regularly (i.e. annually) remind participants on how to update their beneficiaries in light of life-changing events and provide them with the necessary beneficiary designation forms to do so. This includes clear instructions on how to change plan designated beneficiaries or include additional beneficiaries. Clear and consistent information can help avoid costly litigation down the line.

Butterfield Schechter LLP is San Diego County's largest firm with a focus on employee benefit legal services. If you are are providing benefits to your employees, make sure your benefit plans conform with regulatory requirements and represent the best interests of your company and employees. Contact our office today with any questions on how we can help you and your business succeed.

About the Author

Corey F. Schechter

Corey Schechter practices in the areas of Employee Benefits, Employee Stock Ownership Plans, Pension and Profit Sharing Plans, ERISA, ERISA Litigation, Business Law, Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs), and Employment and Labor Law.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Retirement Plans

We help establish a customized plan that meets regulatory requirements as a tax qualified plan. Following implementation, our attorneys can assist clients and their plan administrator with regular reviews and updates to help with regulatory compliance for the plan's operation, and continued effectiveness in meeting the client's specific goals.


We are dedicated to employee ownership. When you come to us for ESOP services, you receive influential legal counsel who stand beside you to help you stay informed, in compliance, and abreast of the latest developments-all to help you realize your plan goals as fully and effectively as possible.


A QDRO is a specially designed court order that is required for the division of retirement benefits in a family law case. Many family law attorneys do not possess the expertise necessary to divide retirement benefits or stock options upon divorce. We have extensive experience in dividing qualified plans, government plans, IRAs and stock options between the employee spouse and non-employee spouse.

Butterfield Schechter LLP provides the information in this website as a service to its clients and visitors to the site. This website is for information purposes only and is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The information in this website is provided "as is," and while the information in this website is updated periodically, additional facts or future developments may affect subjects contained herein, and no guarantee is given that the information provided is correct, complete, or up-to-date. Seek the advice of professional counsel before acting or relying upon any article, form, or information in this web site. To ensure compliance with the requirements imposed by the United States Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of: (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein. Butterfield Schechter LLP has endeavored to comply with all known legal and ethical requirements in compiling this website. In the event that this communication does not conform with any laws or regulations of any state or country in which it may be received, Butterfield Schechter LLP will not accept legal representation based on this communication from a person in such a state or country. Electronic mail is provided as a convenience in communicating with the attorneys at Butterfield Schechter LLP. Contact by e-mail does not alone create an attorney-client relationship. Please remember Internet e-mail is not secure and messages sent to the firm or any of its employees or attorneys should not contain sensitive or confidential information. Thank you for visiting our site.