Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Part I
Update & Refresher
Listed Transactions Connected
With Benefit Plans
 
November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
2
Introduction & Scope
  • 858.444.2300
  • rbutterfield@bsllp.com
3
412(i) PLANS, 419A(f)(6), 419(e) PLANS
  • IRC § 412(i) fully insured Defined Benefit Plan
  • IRC § 419A(f)(6) Welfare Plans
  • 419(e) Welfare Plan


4
What is a listed transaction?
5
What is the penalty?
6
What triggers the penalty?
7
How is the penalty calculated by IRS
8
Amend a return?
9
Amend a return?
10
Situations…What to Do?
11
Situations…What to Do?
12
Examples of
 the Ugliness
13
“Cowboy” Agents
14
Cover Your Butt!
15
Part II
Fallout of Some
412(i) & 419(e) Matters
 
November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
16
Actual Situation in Use
  • Insurance Company Disclaimer Form
  • Recent case in Federal District Court

    Omni Home Financing v. Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Co. 4-29-08.
17
Court Ruling
  • Reasonable reliance ordinarily cannot be shown when written documents contradict alleged oral misrepresentations.
  • The disclaimers the trustee signed clearly explained that the Company should not rely on Hartford and the Agent for legal and tax advice
  • The documents were not long in length and thus were not burdensome to read, and the Company principals were sophisticated business people
  • The Company could not show reasonable reliance
18
WATCHWORD
  • Never knowingly let your client enter into a transaction involving a financial institution, insurance company, etc. where such a form is to be signed (getting independent advice is always the best practice even if a form like that is not presented).
19
419(e) Malpractice Case
  • Suing a local tax practitioner over a disallowed deduction to a 419(e) Welfare Plan.
  • Defense: was that the funds are irrevocably transferred to the Welfare Plan, thus if the employer had irrevocably transferred the funds to someone
  • Problem with the theory
20
Burden of Proof in Tax Malpractice
  • Settled law is the burden of proof switches to the Defendant to prove the IRS was wrong in a case where the IRS has disallowed a deduction. Taxpayers who believe a tax practitioner committed malpractice do not have to litigate the case through Tax Court and beyond to establish malpractice.
21
Notice 2007 – 84
  • Some financial outfits/financial planners/lawyers are promoting post – retirement medical benefit and life insurance benefit plans (rules limit life insurance to $50,000 of coverage)
  • The “pitch” is “wink-wink”, “you will terminate the business or all employees before they reach retirement age, and thus no one but the owners will get anything.”
22
“Wink-Wink” Marketing
  • IRS is aware
  • “The tax benefit rule may require that some or all of the deductions taken by the employer in earlier years be included in its income in later years when an event occurs that is fundamentally inconsistent with the premise on which the deductions were initially based.”
23

 Part III
Benefit Strategies
Under IRS/FTB Attack

November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
24
Strategy #1
  • 1. Client creates management or consulting firm Company A contracts with Company B for management marketing and/or consulting services and shifts money to Company B.
  • 2. Company B employs Company B’s owner and pays him/her salary.  Company B establishes a Defined Benefit Plan and/or a 419(e) Welfare Plan.  Company A employees not covered under Defined Benefit Plan. The Defined Benefit Plan occasionally is a 412(i) fully insured plan.
25
Strategy #1
  • 3. Company A contracts with Company B for management marketing and/or consulting services and shifts money to Company B.


  • 4. Company B employs Company B’s owner and pays him/her salary.  Company B establishes a Defined Benefit Plan and/or a 419(e) Welfare Plan.  Company A employees not covered under Defined Benefit Plan. The Defined Benefit Plan occasionally is a 412(i) fully insured plan.

    Does it work?  NO.
26
Strategy #2
  • Similar variation of Strategy #1 except there are two side corporations:
  • California corporation #1 owned by same people who own corporation # 2 below – employees work here.
  • California corporation #2 owned by same owners as corporation #1 with Pension Plan covering owners only (how the lawyer though that flew is a mystery)
  • California corporation with Pension Plan owned by an irrevocable trust
27
Strategy #3
  • Main corporation with non-owner employees
  • Management Company owned by Irrevocable Trust
  • S corporation owned by ESOP – with revenue source from royalties of intellectual property or other services coming from “main corporation”.
28
Strategy #4
  • Get this! Local CPA firm sets
    up two corporations


  • California – employees are here – No Pension
  • Nevada – owners here – Pension
29
Strategy #5
  • Los Angeles County based practitioner who reportedly has dozens of local clients
  • Incorporated business
  • Set up 419(e) Plan and Defined Benefit Pension Plan
  • Don’t hire an actuary, just put in whatever you want and deduct it.
  • Don’t cover any employees.
30
Three Basic Options
  • Contest the IRS determinations and go “unagreed”
  • Settle the Case on terms
  • Agree to IRS Position on Plan closure and all issues but the penalties
31
Comment to all Three Methods
32

 Part IV
Other IRS Benefit Plan Issues of Concern in 2007-2008

November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
33
Change,

   Change,

       Change
34
409A Compliance
35
Converting an IRA to a Roth IRA
36
Eligibility Screw-Ups
37
Predictable Employee Disputes
38
Giving Advice?
39
Small Plan Bonding
40
IRS Blast on “ROBS”
41
Impact of HEART Act
42
Supreme Court QDRO
43
DBP Lump Sum Certification
44
Transfer of Plans?
45

 Part V
Highlights of Some
Newer Pension Concepts

November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
46
DBP Straddle
  • Calendar Year S Corp
  • DBP year of December 1 to November 30
47
DBP Funding Impact
  • Pension Protection Act of 2006
48
Recent Example of Impact of PPA
49
Recent Example of Impact of PPA
50
Cash Balance Plans
51

 Part VI
Increases in COLA
Limits for 2009

November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
52
2009 Limits
53

 Part VII
Contributions to IRAs

November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
54
Contributions to IRAs
  • Deductible?
    Are you or your spouse an “active participant” in the qualified plan?
55
Contributions to IRAs
  • Saver’s Credit for Lower Income – 2008 Limits
    Saver’s tax credit rates for up to $2,000 of contributions based on AGI are as follows:
56
SIMPLE Retirement Account
  • Example
    His/her maximum 2008 and 2009 SIMPLE is:

       2008 2009
  • 1. Deferral $10,500     $11,500
      
    2. Catch up Deferral $2,500         $2,500
     
    3. Employer Match $9,000 $9,000

  •     Total: $22,000 $23,000




57
Roth IRAs
  • Eligibility - 2008 & 2009
58
Pension Protection Act of 2006
59
Pension Protection Act of 2006
60

 Part VIII
Creditor Protection Update

November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
61
Creditor Protection Update
62

 Part IX
Amendment Cycles

November 2008

Robert K. Butterfield
Butterfield Schechter, LLP     www.bsllp.com
63
EGTRRA Amendment Cycles
64
Interim Amendments
65
Questions & Answers