Blog

Contact Us for More Information

Risks of 409A Non-Compliance (Pt 2 of 2)

Posted by Corey F. Schechter | Feb 01, 2017 | 0 Comments

Startup_20plan

After asking whether you need a 409A valuation before issuing stock options for your startup, the answer was likely: yes. Still, it is not uncommon for entrepreneurs to reconsider seeking a valuation even after they know that they should. Before foregoing compliance with the tax code, executives and employees can face penalties for IRC 409A violations.

As we explained in an earlier blog post, section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code applies to the treatment of federal income tax for non-qualified deferred compensation paid to a “service provider” by a “service recipient.” For many startups, this includes stock options given to employees, executives, independent contractors, or other businesses.

Stock value in illiquid companies is difficult to quantify. However, in order to meet safe harbor requirements under 409A, a company generally requires an independent valuation. Unfortunately, the startup may not have the cash available to pay for an independent appraisal, which could run tens of thousands of dollars. Instead, the business owners or board may make their own assessment of the value of the stock and hope to avoid 409A penalties.

Unfortunately, most of the risks of 409A non-compliance fall directly on the recipient of the compensation. Executives, employees, contractors and other businesses are penalized when a stock option is not properly valued or does not meet safe harbor provisions. Specifically, penalties include:

  • Deferred compensation for the taxable year and prior taxable years becomes includible in gross income for the taxable year;
  • Accrued interest is assessed on the taxable amount; and
  • A federal penalty of 20% of the deferred compensation to be included in gross income is assessed.
  • In addition, a 409A violation may trigger state-level penalties by assessing additional California taxes and a further 20% penalty.

As an example, an executive gets 100,000 stock options at $5 a share; however, if the fair value of the shares is $8 a share, they would be receiving a $300,000 benefit as far as the IRS is concerned. The executive would be taxed in that tax year on $300,000, as well as accrued interest. In addition, they may face a penalty of $60,000 to the federal government and another $60,000 to California.

The penalties may be assessed whether or not the employee or executive actually cashes out their options. In the worst case scenario, if the value of the stock is less than option price at the time the company goes public, they may have to pay the tax and penalties without receiving any financial benefit from the stock options.

Violations do not need to be intentional, even a minor violation or failure to gain safe harbor status can lead to serious 409A penalties. Given these possible scenarios, paying a few thousand dollars for a 409A valuation can eliminate the risk of penalties for recipients of non-qualified deferred compensation.

Butterfield Schechter LLP is San Diego County's largest firm focusing its law practice on business counseling, tax law, and benefits. Our firm can help your startup grow while staying in compliance with the latest regulations and filing requirements. Contact our office today with any questions on how we can help you and your business succeed.

About the Author

Corey F. Schechter

Corey Schechter practices in the areas of Employee Benefits, Employee Stock Ownership Plans, Pension and Profit Sharing Plans, ERISA, ERISA Litigation, Business Law, Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs), and Employment and Labor Law.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Retirement Plans

We help establish a customized plan that meets regulatory requirements as a tax qualified plan. Following implementation, our attorneys can assist clients and their plan administrator with regular reviews and updates to help with regulatory compliance for the plan's operation, and continued effectiveness in meeting the client's specific goals.

ESOPs

We are dedicated to employee ownership. When you come to us for ESOP services, you receive influential legal counsel who stand beside you to help you stay informed, in compliance, and abreast of the latest developments-all to help you realize your plan goals as fully and effectively as possible.

QDROs

A QDRO is a specially designed court order that is required for the division of retirement benefits in a family law case. Many family law attorneys do not possess the expertise necessary to divide retirement benefits or stock options upon divorce. We have extensive experience in dividing qualified plans, government plans, IRAs and stock options between the employee spouse and non-employee spouse.

Butterfield Schechter LLP provides the information in this website as a service to its clients and visitors to the site. This website is for information purposes only and is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The information in this website is provided "as is," and while the information in this website is updated periodically, additional facts or future developments may affect subjects contained herein, and no guarantee is given that the information provided is correct, complete, or up-to-date. Seek the advice of professional counsel before acting or relying upon any article, form, or information in this web site. To ensure compliance with the requirements imposed by the United States Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of: (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein. Butterfield Schechter LLP has endeavored to comply with all known legal and ethical requirements in compiling this website. In the event that this communication does not conform with any laws or regulations of any state or country in which it may be received, Butterfield Schechter LLP will not accept legal representation based on this communication from a person in such a state or country. Electronic mail is provided as a convenience in communicating with the attorneys at Butterfield Schechter LLP. Contact by e-mail does not alone create an attorney-client relationship. Please remember Internet e-mail is not secure and messages sent to the firm or any of its employees or attorneys should not contain sensitive or confidential information. Thank you for visiting our site.

Menu